| Model Number |
GLM910030 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Stretched (1601); Failure to Advance (2524)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/07/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Procode is: krd/hcg.The initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The initial reporter facility name: (b)(6) hospital.Device evaluated by mfr: the device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date as indicated as other in this section as the reason for non-evaluation.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.The product analysis laboratory reviewed the two photos included in the complaint.The review is documented below.[photo analysis]: two photos were included.One of the photos shows the embolic coil with a stretched condition on the proximal portion; however, it seems to be still attached to the rest of the device.No other damages were noticed.The second photo shows the embolic coil from a different angle, a blue segment which seems to be the stretch resistance fiber exposed due to the coil stretching can be observed; due to the blurriness of this photo, no other damages can be observed.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (30490123) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The reported issue in the complaint that the coil was unraveled / stretched was confirmed based on the appearance of the coil in the photos.However, the reported issue that the coil was impeded in the microcatheter could not be evaluated based on the photos.If when the complaint product is returned, an assessment will be performed based on the condition of the device.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular coil embolization procedure, when the physician filled the aneurysm with a 1.00mm x 3.00cm galaxy g3 mini (glm910030 / 30490123), the last 1 cm of the coil became impeded in the microcatheter and could no longer be advanced.The physician retracted the coil and found that it had become unraveled / stretched.Then it was reported that the physician completed the procedure.There was no report of any patient adverse event nor complication.The complaint also included two photos of the complaint device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report that the product was received in the product analysis lab on 17-oct-2022.The returned product is pending evaluation.A supplemental 3500a report will be submitted once the product investigation has been completed.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report the investigational finding of the returned device.[conclusion]: the healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular coil embolization procedure, when the physician filled the aneurysm with a 1.00mm x 3.00cm galaxy g3 mini (glm910030 / 30490123), the last 1 cm of the coil became impeded in the microcatheter and could no longer be advanced.The physician retracted the coil and found that it had become unraveled / stretched.Then it was reported that the physician completed the procedure.There was no report of any patient adverse event nor complication.The complaint also included two photos of the complaint device.Multiple attempts to obtain additional information related to the procedure and the reported device issue were unsuccessful.If additional information is received at a later date, this complaint file will be updated accordingly.The product analysis laboratory reviewed the two photos included in the complaint.The review is documented below.[photo analysis]: two photos were included.One of the photos shows the embolic coil with a stretched condition on the proximal portion; however, it seems to be still attached to the rest of the device.No other damages were noticed.The second photo shows the embolic coil from a different angle, a blue segment which seems to be the stretch resistance fiber exposed due to the coil stretching can be observed; due to the blurriness of this photo, no other damages can be observed.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (30490123) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The reported issue in the complaint that the coil was unraveled / stretched was confirmed based on the appearance of the coil in the photos.The complaint device was returned for evaluation and analysis.The investigation finding is documented below.Investigation summary: a non-sterile 1.00mm x 3.00cm galaxy g3 mini was received contained in the decontamination pouch.Visual inspection was performed.The embolic coil component was observed outside of the introducer.No other damages were noted.Microscopic inspection was performed.Under magnification, the embolic coil was observed stretched in the proximal portion; it was noted that as a result of the stretching, the blue fiber was exposed.There were some kinks observed on the embolic coil.The distal outer sheath was not softened, an indication that the resistance heating (rh) coil had not been heated and the detachment process had not been initiated.These damages are consistent with the damages seen in the photos provided.The kinked and stretched conditions found in the coil preclude the proper testing.Such conditions can be reasonably considered to be secondary to the impeded condition encountered during the procedure, and based on this, both customer complaints can be confirmed.An assignment of a root cause is not possible with the information available.There may have been other procedural factors that contributed to the failure mode that cannot be determined in the analysis.There is no indication that the issue reported in the complaint results from a defect inherently related to the device.Coil kinking and stretching are known potential issues associated with the use of this device.The instructions for use (ifu) provides proper handling instructions for the device to prevent such issues from occurring.It is possible that a continuous flush had not been maintained; without a continuous flush, issues such as resistance with the coil and the microcatheter may arise, is suggested that force may have inadvertently applied during the coil advancement and/or retrieval in an attempt to overcome the resistance, which results in a coil stretching and kinking.As part of the cerenovus quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.It should be noted that product failure could be caused by multiple factors.The instructions for use (ifu) does contain the following recommendation: ¿ if unusual friction is still noticed during advancement or retraction of the microcoil system, verify flush lines are open and properly pressurized.Then slowly withdraw the entire microcoil system and examine for damage.Replace it with a new microcoil system.If friction still exists, withdraw, and examine the delivery catheter system.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.Updated sections: the manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|