The product was returned for analysis.Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The complainant indicates the use of non-company as a viscoelastic, which is not qualified for use with company model, this is not a qualified company product combination.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
A physician reported that during a cataract extraction with intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure, the haptic was found to be torn when the lens was implanted during surgery.The lens with the torn haptic was explanted and replaced with a new iol, and the surgery was completed.Additional information was received stating patient experienced corneal edema.
|
Additional information was provided in h.3, h.6 and h.10.The product was returned for analysis and the reported complaint was observed.Intraocular lens returned crushed in intraocular lens case base.Solution is dried on the intraocular lens.One haptic is broken/torn and not returned, the other haptic is intact.The optic is torn/split-cut dividing the intraocular lens in three and scratched/marked-rejectable with fibers.Video shows intraocular lens implantation.The lens and device preparation is not recorded.The cartridge comes in the picture.The lens is advanced into the mid nozzle.The lens is advanced for the implantation from the mid nozzle area without stopping at the pause location to inspect the haptic position.Both haptics appears to be folded over the optic.As the lens is implanted and the lens begins to unfold, the leading haptic is observed to be broken.The lens is explanted, and a new lens is successfully implanted.Based on the review of the video, a broken leading haptic was observed.Lens preparation for the advancement was not provided.Without the evaluation of lens placement, a definitive determination of the reported complaint cannot be made.A final root cause cannot be determined based on available information.Close adherence to the ifu (instructions for use) provides the best opportunity for optimal delivery.Based on the results from the product history record, the products met release criteria.There have been no other complaints reported in the lot number.Correction information was provided in h.10.The complainant indicates the use of non-company or company as a viscoelastic.Non-company ovd is not qualified for use with company model.It is unknown which viscoelastic was used in this case.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|