EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; PROSTHESIS, PULMONIC VALVE, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 9600TFX29A |
Device Problem
Malposition of Device (2616)
|
Patient Problem
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 05/01/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The date of the event is unknown; however, according to the article the study period was from may 2018 to april 2021.For this reason, the first day of the reported study period (01-may 2018) was used as the occurrence date.Article citation: carr, k., nijres, b.M., windsor, j.J., nakamura, y., karimi, m., ricci, m., & aldoss, o.(2022).Single center experience of hybrid pulmonary valve replacement using left anterior thoracotomy with pulmonary artery plication in patients with large right ventricular outflow tract.Journal of the american heart association, 11(14), e026517.The investigation is in progress.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information is provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported through the article, "single-center experience of hybrid pulmonary valve replacement using left anterior thoracotomy with pulmonary artery plication in patients with large right ventricular outflow tract" carr, k.Et al.2022, a single-center, retrospective review of patients undergoing a transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (tpvr) was performed.The study included a total of 11 patients that presented for hybrid tpvr between may 2018 and april 2021.Nine out of 11 patients received a tpvr after main pulmonary artery plication.There were no procedurally related deaths.A well-functioning pulmonary valve was observed in all patients at the last follow-up.Per the authors, during the study period a major complication occurred in only 1 patient (11.1%) after a transvenous tpvr procedure with a 29mm sapien 3 valve.The deployed valve became malpositioned and then failed transcatheter repositioning attempts.This patient underwent a successful surgical removal of the sapien 3 valve and then operative implantation of a bioprosthetic medtronic bioprosthetic valve.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A supplemental mdr is being submitted due to engineering evaluation and medical record review findings.Sections g6, h2, h6: type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusions and h10 has been updated.The device was not returned, and no image evaluation was performed as no imagery was provided.As no device was returned, engineering was unable to perform visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional testing.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of this adverse event is not required at this time.The complaint was unable to be confirmed due to unavailability of procedural imagery.The reported event does not allege a malfunction that could be related to an edwards manufacturing deficiency.As reported, the deployed valve became malpositioned during implant and then failed transcatheter repositioning attempts.Due to insufficient information, a definitive root cause was unable to be determined at this time.Per the instructions for use (ifu), device malposition requiring intervention is a potential adverse event associated with the transcatheter pulmonic valve replacement procedure.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Since no labeling or ifu inadequacies were identified, no corrective/preventative action nor product risk assessment escalation is required.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|