• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU150
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Disturbances (2140)
Date of Event 01/12/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Health effect - impact code 4625 - lri (limbal relaxing incision) and reverse optic capture.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from a patient's right eye as the patient complained of seeing crescent in vision.The doctor diagnosis was negative dysphotopsia.It was also indicated that lri (limbal relaxing incision) and reverse optic capture were performed, and a non-johnson & johnson lens was used as the replacement.No other surgical and/or medical interventions required.Patient outcome was reported to be excellent, and no injury reported.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: oct 20, 2022.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut in half.The lens was cleaned and, no issues that could cause or contribute to dysphotopsia could be identified.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue ¿dysphotopsia¿ was not confirmed.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15506544
Report Number3012236936-2022-02488
Device Sequence Number5255995
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474746619
UDI-Public(01)05050474746619(17)240831
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2024
Device Model NumberDIU150
Device Catalogue NumberDIU150U235
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/01/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/26/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/29/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/10/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/31/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight61 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-