|
EXACTECH, INC. LOGIC TIB INSERT IMPL CRC, SZ 4, 11MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
02-012-51-4011 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Implant Pain (4561); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
| Date of Event |
09/12/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, approximately 1.5 years post op the initial right tka, this female patient was revised due to a swollen knee and pain caused due to poly wear from the bad batch of poly.Insert and patella changed.Patient revised to exactech device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pending evaluation.Concomitant device(s): 02-010-04-0340 - logic cr femoral por, right, sz 4 4719880, 02-012-45-4050 - lgc tibial fit tray cem sz 4f / 5t 6029557, 200-02-41 - three peg patella 41mm 4481559,.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section h10: (h3) the revision reported was most likely the result of prosthesis wear initiated by unintended contact between incongruent surfaces of the tibial insert and femoral component.However, contributions from instability of the knee joint, component alignment, and/or patient-conditions to the sequence of events cannot be determined from the reported clinical information.Having been packaged in a non-conforming vacuum bag for more than five years may also have been contributing factor to the extent of wear noted on the tibial insert.The following sections have corrected information: (h6) component code: 734, bearings.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected information.The following sections were corrected: b1, b2, d8, g2 (correct initial report - australia), h6: clinical code, investigation findings, investigation conclusions.The revision reported was most likely the result of prosthesis wear initiated by unintended contact between incongruent surfaces of the tibial insert and femoral component.However, contributions from instability of the knee joint, component alignment, and/or patient-conditions to the sequence of events cannot be determined from the reported clinical information.Having been packaged in a non-conforming vacuum bag for more than five years may also have been contributing factor to the extent of wear noted on the tibial insert.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|