| Model Number |
321-09-05 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/12/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During surgical use, when the baseplate impactor tip was removed, a bearing and second small metal piece fell out of the end.Assuming the construct of the handle, is a bearing on each end and a metal piece between them, the second bearing was not accounted for.The, per dr parsons, concluded that it was highly unlikely that the second bearing made it into the surgical site.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pending evaluation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section h10: d4: lot number: 275151006.H3: the pin of the ergo impactor handle, that retains the ball and spring mechanism, became dislodged due to a failed weld holding in the retaining pin.The investigation showed the weld failed due to an insufficient weld call out on the engineering prints which lead to confusion between exactech and the manufacturing.Additionally, the manufacturer's process contributed to the weld failure.The manufacturer removed the filler material of the weld during post-processing/finishing of the device via a manual process.No detailed dfm conversations were had with the supplier to understand that the miscommunication of the weld call out was present.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected information.The following sections were corrected: b1, b2, b5, d2a, d2b, d8, h6: medical device problem code, component codes, investigation findings.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during surgical use, and when the baseplate impactor tip was being removed, a ball bearing and second small metal piece fell out of the end.The surgeon noted if there was a bearing on each end and a metal piece between them, the second bearing was not accounted for.The surgeon concluded that it was highly unlikely that the second bearing made it into the surgical site.Additionally, a one-week post-operative radiograph was provided, and the surgeon confirmed no failed device components remained in-situ.The patient was last known to be in stable condition.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|