• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750TFX20A
Device Problems Perivalvular Leak (1457); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problem Hemolysis (1886)
Event Date 09/13/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Per the territory manager (tm), approximately 1 year and 27 days post-implant of a 20mm sapien 3 ultra valve, the patient underwent a valve in valve (viv) tavr procedure using a 20mm sapien 3 ultra valve via transfemoral approach, due to paravalvular leak (pvl).The patient had presented with mild-to-moderate pvl and hemolysis around the s3u with an additional 1cc added at the time of implant.The perceived root cause was possibly the high placement of the valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction to h6; device code, type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusion.The 20mm sapien 3 ultra valve was not returned for evaluation.Without the device returned for evaluation, visual inspection, functional testing, and dimensional analysis were unable to be completed.Imagery was received that showed a 3d area of the native annulus which was 355 cm2, indicative of full foreshortening upon deployment of the 20mm s3u, initial thv position prior to deployment was non-coaxial in reference to the aortic root and too high in reference to the center marker, implanted thv appeared to be 100:0 aortic/ventricular in reference to the basal plane, and the outflow side of the valve appeared to be overlapping with the height of coronary arteries.A device history record (dhr) review was performed and did not reveal any manufacturing non-conformances that would have contributed to the complaint event.The following instructions for use (ifu) were reviewed: commander delivery system with s3/s3u and procedural training manual.Based on this review, no ifu/training deficiencies were identified.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaint for malpositioned valve was confirmed based on provided imagery.The complaint for paravalvular leak (pvl) was unable to be confirmed due to the unavailability of applicable imagery.A review of dhr, lot history, and complaint history did not provide any indication that a manufacturing nonconformance would have contributed to the reported event.In addition, a review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.As reported, "approximately 1 year and 27 days post-implant of a 20mm sapien 3 ultra valve, the patient underwent a valve in valve (viv) tavr procedure using a 20mm sapien 3 ultra valve via transfemoral approach, due to paravalvular leak (pvl).The patient presented with mild-to-moderate pvl and hemolysis around the s3u with an additional 1cc added at the time of implant.The perceived root cause was possibly the high placement of the valve (90 aortic :10 ventricular)." in this case, the imagery review confirmed the presence of a large annulus based on the thv sizing recommendations for a 20mm s3u.Additionally, the initial thv position was confirmed to be too high immediately prior to deployment.A combination of these factors likely accounts for the thv landing too aortic due to thv foreshortening and high initial placement, respectively.Available information suggests that procedural factors (improper valve positioning, undersized thv, malpositioned valve) and the likelihood that the pvl skirt was unable to properly seal against the annulus resulting in pvl may have contributed to the complaint event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards lifesciences
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key15546701
MDR Text Key301235893
Report Number2015691-2022-08277
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103201314
UDI-Public(01)00690103201314(17)230304
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/11/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/04/2023
Device Model Number9750TFX20A
Device Catalogue Number9750TFX20A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/13/2022
Initial Date FDA Received10/05/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/11/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/11/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/30/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age84 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-