• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DFW150
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Blurred Vision (2137); Visual Disturbances (2140); Eye Pain (4467)
Date of Event 12/21/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation as the lens was discarded.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Section h6: health effect - clinical code: 2140 - visual disturbances: glare, dysphotopsia all pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the patient's left eye.The patient stated that he felt as if he was looking through a tunnel through this operative eye and the vision was fuzzy.The glare from the headlights was a distraction as he is seeing three lines that blend.During the first post-operative visit after original implantation, patient stated that both eyes bothered him driving at night due to glare and it was overwhelming.It also caused ocular pain.He added that his only job was uber since he was unemployable and was unable to work driving for uber at night.The pre-operative visual acuity was dsc od 20/25 os 20/25 -2 bat: 20/200 ou and after lens implantation his visual acuity was dsc od 20/20 os 20/40 -2 ph: 20/25 -2.No other intervention was performed.Another monofocal lens of different model but of slightly higher spherical diopter (20d) was used as the replacement iol.During post-operative examination after the explant, patient reported doing very well, and noticing instantly the difference with the replacement monofocal lens with visual acuity being 20/15.The original lens was discarded.No other information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15547243
Report Number3012236936-2022-02458
Device Sequence Number11239058
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474751255
UDI-Public(01)05050474751255(17)241009
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 10/05/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/09/2024
Device Model NumberDFW150
Device Catalogue NumberDFW150U195
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/19/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/05/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/09/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight92 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-