• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number PCB00
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/14/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Per regulation eu (b)(4) (general data protection regulation), patient identifiers were not collected or recorded and therefore are not available.Implant/explant date: does not apply - lens was not implanted.Initial reporter telephone number: (b)(6).The intraocular lens (iol) was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review and possible product return and evaluation, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the shooter was broken, and that the edge of the intraocular lens (iol) was damaged by the plunger.Through follow up we learned that the surgeon tried to implant the lens with tweezers, but this did not work.There was no patient contact with the device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9 - device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9 - date returned to manufacturer: 8th november 2022.Section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint handpiece was received with the plunger rod in the advanced and locked position.The cartridge tip could be observed to be cracked.The handpiece assembly was inspected and, no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issues could be identified.No iol (intraocular lens) was received as part of this return.Therefore, no product evaluation could be performed on the lens.The complaint issue was not confirmed.The other observed issues of cartridge tip cracked/damaged is related and was identified during the product evaluation.However, this could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15552545
Report Number3012236936-2022-02531
Device Sequence Number14152299
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474558397
UDI-Public(01)05050474558397(17)250724
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryAU
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/13/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/24/2025
Device Model NumberPCB00
Device Catalogue NumberPCB0000265
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/15/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/09/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/06/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/13/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/24/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-