|
This spontaneous report was received from a company representative (clinical educator), referring to a female patient of unknown age.The patient's concurrent conditions, concomitant medications and past drug reactions/allergies were not reported.The primigravid patient had a spontaneous uterine inversion, which was corrected.This report concerns 1 patient and 1 device.It was reported that on an unknown date in (b)(6) 2022 (reported as about three days ago) the patient continued to bleed, so vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was inserted (lot# and expiration date were not reported) for post-partum hemorrhaging (postpartum haemorrhage) with quick control of bleeding.The patient was stable until she vomited (vomiting), and the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was expelled (device expulsion) during active treatment with suction on at 80 millimeters of mercury (mmhg).She began to bleed heavily (heavy menstrual bleeding) and was taken to the operation room (or), where she was opened (reported as 'surgical intervention') (required intervention (devices)) , and it was found that her uterus had inverted again (uterine inversion), which was corrected and the bleeding was controlled.No product quality compliant (pqc) reported.On an unknown date in (b)(6) 2022, therapy with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was discontinued.It was unknown if the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was available for evaluation.Upon internal review, the events of device expulsion and uterine inversion were determined to be medically significant.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.(b)(4).
|