• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V; SINGLE USE 2-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V; SINGLE USE 2-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME Back to Search Results
Model Number KD-V431M-0720
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/30/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during a therapeutic endoscopic papillotomy, the knife broke during cutting (during output).The wire did not fall off.The device was replaced with similar device and the intended procedure was completed with no harm or injury to the patient.No user injury reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The lot number was 23k with supplementary information number of ¿07¿.(m-bc manufacture date: mar 7, 2022) reported issue: the cutting wire was broken.Investigation was carried out to confirm the broken portion.Device evaluation found the broken portion was scorched and melted.In investigation performed in the past, a coated portion damage was duplicated by heat generation due to an electrical discharge.Shape of the coated portion of the subject device was similar to the shape confirmed in the past investigation result.The outer diameter of the cutting wire was measured.The result indicated no abnormalities.The length of the coated portion of the cutting wire, and the cutting wire itself presented no abnormalities.There were no missing parts in the subject device.Other abnormalities that could lead to the breakage of the cutting wire were not confirmed.The dhrs (device history records) for this product have been reviewed.No abnormalities found from the device history record of the following items, which related to the reported phenomenon.All records indicate that the product was manufactured and tested in accordance with all applicable procedures and met all final product release criteria.-process inspection sheet -quality inspection sheet -nonconforming product report this instruction manual (drawing no.Gk6224, revision no.9) contains the following information.Therefore, it would be possible to prevent this event from occurring.Since the cutting wire is very thin, it may break off in the following cases: the distance between the papilla of vater and the wire is very short, the output is too high or activated while the wire touches metal parts of the endoscope, or the wire is tightened too strong.When the wire breaks off, its proximal end will be retracted toward the endoscope if the slider is pulled.If the slider is pushed, the wire will be pushed out toward the papilla or move sideways.If the wire breaks off, stop the output immediately and pull the slider completely to retract the broken wire into the tube.Then withdraw the instrument from the papilla.Otherwise, patient injury, such as perforations, bleeding, or lacerations within the biliary duct and/or damage of the endoscope could result.Be sure that the rear end of the cutting wire is extended from the distal end of the endoscope.In case the cutting wire contacts the forceps elevator, insufficient output or unintended tissue injury may occur.Do not activate output while the cutting wire touches the metal parts of the endoscope, or they are being close together.This could burn the tissue and/or damage the endoscope or the instrument.Based on the results of confirmation of the device and the investigation results in the past, a likely mechanism causing the broken cutting wire might be the following.1.The device was not protruded enough from the endoscope until the rear end of the cutting wire was in the field of view.2.Due to the situation of ¿1¿ description, the cutting wire and the endoscope were being close to each other.3.The output was activated in state of ¿2¿ description.This might have led to an electrical discharge between the cutting wire and the distal end of the endoscope.4.An electrical discharge possibly occurred, and the cutting wire became hot instantly.That might have caused the cutting wire to break.It can be inferred that heat generated by an electrical discharge caused damage of the coated portion.Olympus will continue to monitor complaints for this device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide a correction.Section d4 was corrected with information that was inadvertently left out of the initial report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V
Common Device Name
SINGLE USE 2-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME
Manufacturer (Section D)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0 357
JA  036-0357
Manufacturer Contact
masaharu hirose
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0-357
JA   036-0357
426422891
MDR Report Key15554494
Report Number9614641-2022-00426
Device Sequence Number6584646
Product Code KNS
UDI-Device Identifier04953170380631
UDI-Public04953170380631
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K950166
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberKD-V431M-0720
Device Lot Number23K
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/14/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/09/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/11/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/06/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/07/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
VIO300.
Patient SexUnknown
-
-