It was reported that during a neurovascular procedure, resistance was felt when the subject coil was advanced through a microcatheter, but the operator was able to advance the subject coil to the target lesion.The operator decided to remove the subject coil as it repeatedly herniated into the parent vessel.According to the operator the subject coil chosen would not stay in the aneurysm, either too large or no space left.The subject coil was replaced and the procedure was completed successfully.No clinical consequences were reported to the patient due to this event.
|
Although the dhr (device history record) could not be reviewed because the lot number remains unknown, there are controls in the manufacturing process (manufacturing execution system) to ensure the product met specifications upon release the subject device is not available; therefore, functional testing as well as visual testing cannot be performed.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported complaint could not be confirmed, and it could not be definitively determined if the device failed to meet specifications because the product was not returned.Additional information provided by the customer indicated that when advancing the coil in the microcatheter resistance was noted, the coil was advanced but it repeatedly herniated into the parent vessel.While there are a number of potential causes for the reported issue, because review and analysis of available information failed to identify a definitive cause and the device was not returned, an assignable cause of undeterminable was assigned to the as reported "coil in catheter friction and main coil protrusion" for this complaint.
|