|
Although the dhr could not be reviewed because the lot number remains unknown, due to the automated mes system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.The subject device is not available; therefore, functional testing as well as visual testing cannot be performed.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported complaint could not be confirmed, and it could not be definitively determined if the device failed to meet specifications because the product was not returned.Additional information provided by the customer indicated, that the stent performed as intended during the procedure, the physician did not allege any malfunction of any device for this procedure.The indication of the medical procedure was to treat aneurysm.The anatomical location of the target lesion was the right paraopthalmic , the anatomical site where the stent migrated to from the target lesion was that the proximal end of device migrated distally and appears to be larger at the neck of the aneurysm.Proximal ends are fishmouthed.There were adverse consequences/ neurological sequel to the patient due to the reported stent migration as patient had two strokes.The patient was put on dapt indefinitely.It was clarified by the customer that, both proximal and distal end of the stent had fishmouthed, however, the proximal end appears to be worse.There were vessel wall/intimal changes noted at the site of implantation.Stenosis was noted inside device but the percentage of stenosis was not specified.Changes in the aneurysm were that the aneurysm is occluded.While there are a number of potential causes for the reported issue, because review and analysis of available information failed to identify a definitive cause, a cause of undeterminable was assigned to the reported issue ¿stent dislodged/migrated¿.An assignable cause of anticipated procedural complication will be assigned to the reported "patient stroke¿ and ¿stenosis with stent deformation¿ as a product related root cause does not apply and the issue is due to a known physiological effect of the procedure and/or patient condition noted with the directions for use, product labeling and/or risk documentation files.Based upon medical review, the harm observed in the complaint is anticipated in nature as per the device risk assessment.
|