|
Received three 138105 in original packaging.Lot number was verified.Performed a visual inspection of the device, there were no obvious signs of a breach in the seal; however, the device was encroaching into the seal.Performed a functional inspection, the devices were dye leak tested per tm-10-217 rev.F which indicated that the packaging did not have an insufficient heat seal in two out of the three packages.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.A 2 year lot history review was conducted and found this is the only event with a quantity of 3 units for this lot number and failure mode.A two-year review of complaint history revealed there has been a total of 94 reports, regarding (b)(4) devices, for this device family and failure mode.During this same time frame (b)(4) devices have been manufactured and shipped worldwide.Should all the complaint devices have been found confirmed for this reported failure, the rate of failure would be (b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the following: these devices should be inspected before and after each use.Visually examine the devices for obvious physical damage including: cracked, broken or otherwise distorted plastic parts.Damage including cuts, punctures, nicks, abrasions, unusual lumps, significant discoloration.This issue will continue to be monitored through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
|
|
During incoming inspection, the distributor rejected this device, 138105, for an insufficient heatseal.There was no contact with the patient as this was found during incoming inspection.This will be reported as a malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
|