Model Number 22438-19 |
Device Problems
Peeled/Delaminated (1454); Stretched (1601); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/19/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a highly calcified, mildly tortuous, 70% stenosed lesion in the left carotid artery.An emboshield nav6 embolic protection system (eps) was advanced without issue to the target lesion; however, during re-positioning, the barewire guide wire (gw) was pulled back and became caught on an un-known previously implanted stent.The barewire became stretched, and a portion of the wire coating peeled up due to interaction with the implanted stent.None of the wire coating separated into the anatomy and no snare was required.The barewire was removed, and a non-abbott wire was used to successfully complete the procedure.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Visual analysis was performed on the returned product.The reported difficulty advancing was not able to be confirmed as it was related to procedural circumstances.The reported peeling was not confirmed.The reported stretched coils were confirmed.Additionally, it was noted that the barewire core was separated.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties were likely related to circumstances of the procedure.Based on the reported information, the difficulty advancing was due to the barewire getting caught on the previously implanted stent during re-positioning, which also likely caused the stretched tip coils and noted core break.As there was no peeling observed, it is likely that the stretched tip coils were perceived as possible peeling.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|