• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. BIOINDUCTIVE IMPLANT W/ARTH DEL LRG; MESH, SURGICAL, DEPLOYER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. BIOINDUCTIVE IMPLANT W/ARTH DEL LRG; MESH, SURGICAL, DEPLOYER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 4566
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Inflammation (1932)
Date of Event 09/22/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient presented an inflammation 6 weeks after a surgery where 2 regeneten devices were used.The patient was brought back to surgery at 8 weeks, no infection was found but the doctor felt the regeneten was ¿mushy¿ and decided to remove it.He was not sure if there was an issue with regeneten, but he is also not sure it was incorporating like it should.Fixation could have also been an issue as the distal part of the implant may not have been fixated well.No additional complications were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Correction in d2 and g4 (510k).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: h2: additional information on b5.H3, h6: a device deficiency was not identified, and the root cause of the reported event could not be determined since the device was not returned for evaluation.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient presented an inflammation 6 weeks after a surgery where a regeneten implant was used.The patient was brought back to surgery at 8 weeks, no infection was found but the doctor felt the regeneten was ¿mushy¿ and decided to remove it.He was not sure if there was an issue with regeneten, but he is also not sure it was incorporating like it should.Fixation could have also been an issue as the distal part of the implant may not have been fixated well.No additional complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIOINDUCTIVE IMPLANT W/ARTH DEL LRG
Common Device Name
MESH, SURGICAL, DEPLOYER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
150 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
150 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key15591584
Report Number3003604053-2022-00056
Device Sequence Number2136079
Product Code ORQ
UDI-Device Identifier00885556735664
UDI-Public885556735664
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOR
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K140300
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/09/2023
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/20/2025
Device Catalogue Number4566
Device Lot Number2087383
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/22/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/17/2023
06/05/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/12/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/18/2023
06/09/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/20/2022
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-