(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Does the surgeon believe that any of the ethicon products involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? which specific ethicon products have been used during the procedures (product code, lot number)? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with any of the ethicon products used in this procedure? if so, please provide details.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Patient demographics? this report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.Component code: g07002 ¿ device not returned.The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details regarding the additional events.Citation: journal of robotic surgery (2022) 16:429¿436.Https://doi.Org/10.1007/s11701-021-01246-z.
|
Title: comparison of outcome and costs of robotic and laparoscopic right hemicolectomies this retrospective study is to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing right hemicolectomy using laparoscopic or robotic approaches and perform a cost analysis.Between january 2015 to june 2018, a total of 101 patients were included in the study.42 patients (20 were male; mean age of 75 years) underwent laparoscopic resection while 59 patients (30 were male; mean age of 75 years) had robotic surgery.(b)(4).In conclusion, patients have significantly faster return to bowel function and shorter length of stay after robotic vs laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and experience fewer complications.This difference in length of stay may make robotic right hemicolectomies more cost effective.
|