• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS CL IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS CL IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number Z9002
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/15/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was fully inserted in the patient's right eye and was removed and replaced during the same procedure due to a bent haptic.There was no vitrectomy, incision enlargement, or sutures required.Another johnson & johnson lens (same model and diopter) was implanted as a replacement.The patient is doing fine.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Weight/ethnicity: unknown/asked but unavailable.If implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional info: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes section d9: returned to manufacturer on:11/7/2022 section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer¿ yes device evaluation: the complaint lens was received inside of the original lens case.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut in half and with both haptics bent.The lens was cleaned and, no further issues were identified.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue "haptic damaged" was observed during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS CL IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15612688
Report Number3012236936-2022-02618
Device Sequence Number7178572
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474530768
UDI-Public(01)05050474530768(17)260819
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateDE
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P880081
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/19/2026
Device Model NumberZ9002
Device Catalogue NumberZ900200235
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/20/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/04/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/15/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/19/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/19/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight93 KG
-
-