• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON PS X3 TIBIAL INSERT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON PS X3 TIBIAL INSERT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO Back to Search Results
Model Number 5532-G-311
Medical Device Problem Codes Degraded (1153); Fracture (1260); Unstable (1667)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Fall (1848); Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544)
Date of Event 09/21/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.
 
Event or Problem Description
Primary tka was performed in 2018.Revision was required due to loosening.During procedure, it was found that the post of the insert was broken.According to the doctor's opinion, the post was probably broken due to pressure due to patient's fall.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding crack/fracture, wear, and instability involving a triathlon insert was reported.The crack/fracture and wear events were confirmed via evaluation of the returned device.Instability was not confirmed.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection indicated that the damage present on the post of the insert was consistent with delamination and material loss.The post has completely fractured off.Hackles are observed on the fractured surface are consistent with a fracture in overload.The damage on the articulating surface of the insert is consistent with burnishing, scratching, and third body indentations; which are common damage modes of uhmwpe.The yellow discoloration observed on the tibial insert is consistent with the absorption of synovial fluid by the device.Explantation damage around the locking mechanism from removal from the baseplate is also observed.-clinician review: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.-product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to fracture of the insert and joint "loosening" / instability.Visual inspection indicated that the damage present on the post of the insert was consistent with delamination and material loss.The post has completely fractured off.Hackles are observed on the fractured surface are consistent with a fracture in overload.The damage on the articulating surface of the insert is consistent with burnishing, scratching, and third body indentations; which are common damage modes of uhmwpe.The yellow discoloration observed on the tibial insert is consistent with the absorption of synovial fluid by the device.Explantation damage around the locking mechanism from removal from the baseplate is also observed.Trauma may have been a contributing factor to the device failure as it was reported that the patient suffered a fall prior to the revision.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event or Problem Description
Primary tka was performed in 2018.Revision was required due to loosening.During procedure, it was found that the post of the insert was broken.According to the doctor's opinion, the post was probably broken due to pressure due to patient's fall.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIATHLON PS X3 TIBIAL INSERT
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
diana rogers
210 centennial avenue
centennial park, elstree
borehamwood WD6 3-SJ
UK   WD6 3SJ
2082386500
MDR Report Key15612891
Report Number0002249697-2022-01494
Device Sequence Number7148875
Product Code MBH
UDI-Device Identifier07613327050639
UDI-Public07613327050639
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K141056
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2018
Device Explanted Year2022
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2021
Device Model Number5532-G-311
Device Catalogue Number5532-G-311
Device Lot Number9266KV
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/21/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/09/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/16/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/07/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient SexFemale
-
-