• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL GALAXY G3 6MM X 20CM; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL GALAXY G3 6MM X 20CM; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number GLY120620
Medical Device Problem Codes Stretched (1601); Failure to Advance (2524)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/19/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Procode: krd/hcg.Initial reporter: the customer contact information, including name, occupation, phone, fax, and e-mail address, was not reported.The device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date as indicated as ¿other¿ in this section as the reason for non-evaluation.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The company is seeking this information through the event investigation.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported by the field, during a coil embolization, a 6mm x 20cm galaxy g3 coil (gly120620, 30490146) was used as the third coil.However, the coil couldn't be advanced nor retrieved by the physician.The physician pulled the coil and the unspecified microcatheter (mc) at the same time.After inspection, it turns out the coil was stretched.There was no patient injury reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Complaint conclusion: as reported by the field, during a coil embolization, a 6mm x 20cm galaxy g3 coil (gly120620, 30490146) was used as the third coil.However, the coil couldn't be advanced nor retrieved by the physician.The physician pulled the coil and the unspecified microcatheter (mc) at the same time.After inspection, it turns out the coil was stretched.There was no patient injury reported.A non-sterile galaxy g3 6mm x 20cm was received and contained in the decontamination pouch.Upon receiving the device, a visual inspection was performed, and it was noted that the core wire was found to be severely kinked and protruded from the introducer.No other apparent damages were found in the device.The device was inspected under microscopic magnification, and it was found that the embolic coil was severely stretched and remained inside the introducer.The distal outer sheath had not been softened, indicating that the resistance heating coil had not been heated and the detachment process was not initiated.Also, the introducer was inspected, and it was found opened by a kinked condition at the section where the core wire is protruding.The impeded condition of the coil in the microcatheter, as documented in the complaint, could not be tested since the conditions in which the coil was received prevented the advancement and retraction through the introducer.However, such conditions can be reasonably considered secondary to the issue encountered during the procedure.Based on this, the customer complaint was able to be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 30490146 number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.Coil stretching is a known potential issue associated with the use of this device.The instructions for use (ifu) provide proper handling instructions for the device to prevent such issues from occurring.Stretching can occur during procedure handling where force may have been inadvertently applied.This condition confirms the customer's allegation regarding a coil stretch; however, with the limited information available, the root cause of the coil stretching remains unknown.The appearance of the coil and core wire components suggests that force may have been inadvertently applied in an attempt to overcome the resistance.There is no indication that the issue reported in the complaint results from a defect inherently related to the device.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint were identified.It should be noted that multiple factors could cause product failure.The instructions for use (ifu) do contain the following recommendation: ¿ if unusual friction is still noticed during advancement or retraction of the microcoil system, verify flush lines are open and properly pressurized.Then slowly withdraw the entire microcoil system and examine for damage.Replace it with a new microcoil system.If friction still exists, withdraw and examine the delivery catheter system.Multiple attempts to obtain additional information were unsuccessful.If information is provided at a later date, the file will be reopened and processed accordingly.As part of the cerenovus quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GALAXY G3 6MM X 20CM
Common Device Name
NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. (FREMONT)
47709 fremont blvd
fremont CA 94538
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
3035526892
MDR Report Key15614829
Report Number3008114965-2022-00661
Device Sequence Number5961055
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier10886704077541
UDI-Public10886704077541
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryKS
PMA/510(K) Number
K150319
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/03/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2023
Device Model NumberGLY120620
Device Catalogue NumberGLY120620
Device Lot Number30490146
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/26/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/20/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/17/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/03/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/17/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
UNSPECIFIED MICROCATHETER
Patient SexUnknown
-
-