Please note the correction to h6 results code.The reported event could be confirmed, since one of the two visible screws on the received x-rays is broken apart.A device inspection was not possible since the affected device was not returned.A review of the device history was not possible because the lot number was not communicated.No corrective actions are required at this time.The catalog number and lot number were not communicated.The available information and the received x-rays were compared with different stryker screw systems including asnis iii and fixos, which are typical standalone screws.The review has shown that the screws on the x-ray could be a variax 2 bone screw, t10 full thread, 2.7mm.There are slight differences in the head shape visible, but this can be traced back to the quality of the x-ray and the insertion angle of the screw.However, it can finally also not be completely excluded that the visible bone screw is from a competitor as such bone screws belong to the standard portfolio of a medical device manufacturer.A review of the potentially affected variax 2 labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Indications of material, manufacturing, or design related problems were unable to be identified as the catalog number and lot number were not communicated.The complaint was forwarded to medical affairs for review with following result: "in my opinion from the sent x-ray i can only confirm one breakage for sure.The other screw looks intact.Although reading through the added patient history, it is not 100% clear to me what has happened.There is information in it, that the initial joint replacement included a patella component.That seems to have loosened¿there is a meeting minute with the patient that the doctor informed the patient on two potential treatment options.1.Replacement of the component; 2.Patellectomy.This third potential treatment was not mentioned before.Is it a iatrogenic fracture while explantation of the old component? whatever the cause is¿.If we have a fracture here, an attempt for fracture treatment could be made with screws.The orientation of the screws suggests, that there was a longitudinal fracture of the patella.It could also have been complex with the chosen combination of k-wires and screws.However, the only fracture that can be addressed sufficiently with screws-k-wires only is a longitudinal one.Otherwise it would require a tension bend wiring and usually one would add a circumferential cerclage around the patella to prevent secondary displacement." finally, more detailed information, including catalog- and lot number, about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.In general following statements related to implant breakage of the variax 2 instructions for use can be pointed out: ¿adverse events and adverse effects in many instances, adverse results may be clinically related rather than device related.The following are the most frequent adverse effects involving the use of internal fracture fixation devices: delayed union or non-union of the fracture site.These devices can break when subjected to the increased loading associated with delayed unions and/or non-unions.Internal fixation devices are load sharing devices which are intended to hold fractured bone surfaces in apposition to facilitate healing.If healing is delayed or does not occur, the appliance may eventually break due to metal fatigue.Loads on the device produced by load bearing and the patient¿s activity level will dictate the longevity of the device.Conditions attributable to non-union, osteoporosis, osteomalacia, diabetes, inhibited revascularization and poor bone formation can cause loosening, bending, cracking, fracture of the device or premature loss of rigid fixation with the bone.Improper alignment can cause a mal-union of the bone and/or bending, cracking or even breakage of the device.¿ if the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|