|
On (b)(6) 2022, during the implanting procedure of a carbomedics standard aortic mechanical heart valve, a5-019, the damage of the valve sewing rings ¿ slit was noted which resulted in failure of the sutures of the valve and which threatened the life of the patient.Thereafter, a new valve was implanted in the patient.Based on the medical judgement received, at the beginning of the operation, no unusual thing was noticed with the valve.The problem was noted during the procedure, when the stitches were placed in the sewing ring, so tears are caused during the passage of the stitches through the sewing ring.Then, it was decided to use another valve and procedure was performed successfully and the patient was released from the hospital.
|
|
The device was returned to the manufacturer.During the visual inspection performed after the formalin treatment, the distortion between the holder and the device and the tension on the green threads between the holder and the fabric of the cuff are clear.The holder appears partially outside the device itself reasonably due to an overload applied on the holder tip and the prosthesis.The visual inspection conducted by means of the microscope, was focused principally to ''slit'' observed on the cuff, but also to the alteration detected on the tip of the holder.The mentioned slit on the cuff is due to the separation of two portion of the cuff that by design are joined by a stitching line which appears interrupted.Further enlargements, documenting the morphology of each end, clearly show that the thread has been cut.It is not possible to identify with certainty the cause of this clean cut, but it is reasonable to relate it to the use of surgical instruments (i.E., scissors or scalpels) or, more likely, the use of sharp needles.With regard to the partial exit of the holder from the valve, it can be highlighted that several imprints have been identified both inside and outside the tip of the holder.These traces are undoubtedly attributable to the use of surgical instruments (i.E., klemmer pliers, hemostatic forceps etc.), but the reason why it was necessary to apply such a force as to favor their displacement remains unclear.Nonetheless, it can be considered irrelevant to the root cause of the alteration claimed and observed on the cuff.Based on the analysis performed, the reported event cannot be explained by any factor intrinsic in the involved device.The inspections performed on the returned valve confirmed the absence of manufacturing defects.The separation of the two portions of fabric is due to the interruption of the stitching line which, by design, unites them.The morphology of both ends of the thread is clearly related to a clean cut.As such, the most probable cause of this cut can be reasonably related to the use of surgical instruments or, more likely, the use of sharp needles.
|