• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Crack (1135)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/09/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the surgeon noticed a crack in the preloaded cartridge when starting to insert the intraocular lens (iol) into patient's left eye.The second preloaded device used too had similar issue that the cartridge cracked.Only the cartridges had patient contact with the eye in both the cases.The procedure was completed using another lens of different model, but of same diopter and no other intervention was required.No other information was provided.This report captures the second lens mentioned above and a separate report is being submitted to capture the first lens mentioned.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification revealed the damaged complaint lens was received stuck inside the cartridge of the complaint simplicity handpiece.The cartridge was observed cracked with the lens protruding from the crack and the cartridge tip was observed damaged.No additional defects or assembly issues were observed before and after disassembly.The lens was not removed to avoid introducing additional damage unrelated to the return condition of the lens.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.The search revealed no additional investigation request (ir) for this production order number has been received.Conclusion: the reported complaint issue cartridge crack was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15643493
Report Number3012236936-2022-02639
Device Sequence Number17759865
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731714
UDI-Public(01)05050474731714(17)240618
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 10/20/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/18/2024
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0180
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/20/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/05/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/18/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-