• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARDIA® COUDE OLIVE TIP URETHRAL FOLEY CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARDIA® COUDE OLIVE TIP URETHRAL FOLEY CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 802520
Medical Device Problem Code Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/12/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient had been using the intermittent catheters since 1980 and noticed an issue on and off for years.Customer stated that the issue was it seemed all the red rubber intermittent catheters were not the same size although it stated it was on the package and how they knew was that the tips were obviously different in size and it affected the results during usage.Stated that if the tip was smaller the customer was successful and if it was larger or fuller the customer was not.Per customer via email on (b)(6) 2022, it was stated that in a package of 15 intermittent catheters, the majority of the catheters were too big.The customer provided two lot numbers (batch#: nggn0626 material#: 802520 ; batch#: ngep1662 material#: 802520).The customer stated that this had been going on for a few years.Per investigator notification on (b)(6) 2022, it was reported that an unopened intermittent catheter sent for sample evaluation was noted to be twisted when returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient had been using the intermittent catheters since 1980 and noticed an issue on and off for years.Customer stated that the issue was it seemed all the red rubber intermittent catheters were not the same size although it stated it was on the package and how they knew was that the tips were obviously different in size and it affected the results during usage.Stated that if the tip was smaller the customer was successful and if it was larger or fuller the customer was not.Per customer via email on 24aug2022, it was stated that in a package of 15 intermittent catheters, the majority of the catheters were too big.The customer provided two lot numbers (batch# nggn0626 material# 802520 ; batch# ngep1662 material# 802520).The customer stated that this had been going on for a few years.Per investigator notification on 12oct2022, it was reported that an unopened intermittent catheter sent for sample evaluation was noted to be twisted when returned per notification from investigator based on sample evaluation on 09feb2023, it was found that the sticky residue was present on the surface of the intermittent catheter.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event is confirmed, cause unknown.Three coude olive tip catheters were returned unopened.The catheters were noted to be smooth.Catheter 1 - the coude tip did not appear to be aligned with coude indicator notch when the catheter was removed from the packaging and laid flat, the catheter was then secured with tape to remain flat and the tip and coude indicator notch were noted be be aligned.Catheter 2 - the coude tip was noted to align with the coude indicator notch when the catheter was removed from the packaging and laid flat.Catheter 3 - the coude tip was noted to align with the coude indicator notch when the catheter was removed from the packaging and laid flat.Using a french gauge all three catheters were confirmed to be 22fr., which is out of specifications which states, "accept if french size measures within +/- 1 french size." although a specific cause cannot be determined, based on the risk document a potential root cause for this event could be, "inappropriate package design".The device was not used for patient treatment.The device history record was reviewed and found nothing that could have caused or contributed to the reported event.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "visually inspect the product for any imperfections or surface deterioration prior to use." h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: the actual/suspected device was inspected.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BARDIA® COUDE OLIVE TIP URETHRAL FOLEY CATHETER
Common Device Name
FOLEY CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer Contact
xeeroy rada
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
7707846100
MDR Report Key15649865
Report Number1018233-2022-08048
Device Sequence Number2381403
Product Code KOD
UDI-Device Identifier00801741039072
UDI-Public(01)00801741039072
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/30/2026
Device Model Number802520
Device Catalogue Number802520
Device Lot NumberNGGN0626
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/02/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/12/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/01/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/21/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/26/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-