• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: H.S. HOSPITAL SERVICE S.P.A. HS AMICA; MICROWAVE TISSUE COAGULATION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

H.S. HOSPITAL SERVICE S.P.A. HS AMICA; MICROWAVE TISSUE COAGULATION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number AMICA-PROBE
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/13/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
Patient undergoing image guided microwave ablation of liver lesion.The first lesion was ablated at 60wx10min.The probe was then repositioned, and the ablation continued at 80wx12min.The probe was removed and positioned in the second lesion for an ablation at 80wx10min.The probe was again removed.Char was wiped from the shaft.No damage to the tip was noted.Multiple passes were required to place the probe in the third lesion, which was ablated at 80wx10min.Upon probe removal, it was noted that tip was no longer attached.The retained tip was visible in ct imaging.What was the original intended procedure? image guided microwave ablation of liver lesion.What problem did the user have (check all that apply): device failed (e.G.Broke, couldn't get it to work or stopped working).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Into the instructions for use is reported: continuous energy deliveries lasting more than 15 minutes are not provided for.However, if the medical user of amica-gen responsible for the ablation treatment execution, under his/her exclusive responsibility, decides to prolong the treatment beyond that limit, he/she may re-start the treatment (upon appropriate modification of the working parameters set, if needed) and keep on delivering energy until the intended therapeutic goal is deemed to be reached.Nevertheless, it must be said that the prolonged use of the same disposable applicator, beyond the maximum time provided for its continuative use and especially when high power delivery is implicated, may increase the risk of probe damage or malfunction, due to the remarkable thermal, mechanic, electric and electromagnetic stress to which the applied part is subject.As reported by the customers the applicator has been used for total 32 minutes (3 insertions) before observing the tip detachment.This risk is contained in our risk analysis.The overall frequency of detachments of some part of the tip is approximately 10-3 if applicators are used for 15 minutes.These frequency is coherent with our current approved risk assessment, which therefore has not been reviewed.The risk of tumoral seeding along the needle track is intrinsic to all percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, including biopsies and thermal ablation procedures.This risk is widely accepted in view of the expected clinical benefit for the patient also when cauterization of the needle track is not feasible.After a thermal ablation procedure the risk of tumoral seeding is further lowered by: 1) tumor cells destruction enforced by local energy delivery; 2) possibility of cauterizing the needle track by delivering energy while withdrawing the needle from the ablation site.In this reported event track ablation failed, but prior energy delivery ensured tumoral cells destruction, therefore outruling or substantially decreasing the risk of seeding.When the tip of the applicator is released in the patient body, the patient is at risk of mechanical, chemical and biological interactions between the object and the body.The chemical risk can be rejected because all the components of the tip, made of zirconia, ptfe and gold-coated brass, are biocompatible.The biological risk can also be excluded because the applicator is sterile.The risk of mechanical interaction can be evaluated by the physician, who can decide either to remove the tip or to let it in place.In most cases, it is negligible, because the breakage in the body happens due to hard, carbonized tissues sticking to the tip.In this case, also, the tip is embodied in a thick layer of carbonized tissues surrounded by necrotized tissues.Carbonized and necrotized tissues are hard, thus making the possibility of migration of the piece extremely unlikely.The failure here considered falls within category p1.2 of the risk analysis of amica probe.In view of the frequency, dangers and mitigations applied and of the benefits of the treatment, the resulting residual risk is largely acceptable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HS AMICA
Common Device Name
MICROWAVE TISSUE COAGULATION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
H.S. HOSPITAL SERVICE S.P.A.
via angela vacchi 23/25
aprilia, italy, latina 04011
IT  04011
Manufacturer (Section G)
H.S. HOSPITAL SERVICE S.P.A.
via angela vacchi 23/25
aprilia, italy, latina 04011
IT   04011
Manufacturer Contact
laura lenzi
via angela vacchi 23/25
aprilia, italy, latina 04011
IT   04011
MDR Report Key15658023
Report Number0008010312-2022-00001
Device Sequence Number17571751
Product Code GEI
UDI-Device Identifier08033055147163
UDI-Public08033055147163
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K182605
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Risk Manager
Remedial Action Inspection
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 10/24/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/04/2026
Device Model NumberAMICA-PROBE
Device Catalogue NumberAPK14150T19V5
Device Lot Number41659
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/21/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/24/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/05/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight42 KG
Patient RaceWhite
-
-