|
Zimmer biomet complaint number (b)(4).Age and date of birth unknown / not provided.Weight unknown / not provided.Date of event unknown / not provided.Email address unknown / not provided.Pma/510(k) number: k101880.It is unknown at this time if the device will be returned for analysis; however, an investigation of the reported event is in progress.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
|
|
This report is being submitted to relay additional information and device evaluation.The following sections are being reported: h6: type of investigation codes were updated: 4114, 4109, 4110, 4111.H6: investigation findings code was updated: 213.H6: investigation conclusion code was updated: 4315.One imp,tsv,mcol mg,4.7mm,13m (b)(6) was not returned for investigation.Since product has not been returned, physical inspection could not be performed.The investigation has been performed based on the available information using the item number, lot number and associated ifu/rmf files.Based on the evaluation, device malfunction could not be verified.There is no existing nonconformance / capa / hhe/d / ie / product hold against the reported device that did or could cause or contribute to the reported event.Monthly post market trending review identified no adverse trends or actionable trends for the reported event or device.Zimvie quality management system (qms) has controls in place to ensure the distribution of conforming products.Therefore, based on the available information, the product was within specifications and conforming when it left zimvie.Dhr review for the lot (1215635) had revealed no deviations nor non-conformances which could have caused or contributed to the reported events.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number (1215635) for similar events the reported event could not be recreated due to the nature of the dental device and event.The complaint is related to the functional performance of the device.A definitive root cause could not be determined.However, based on the investigation, risk review and ifu, the most likely causes determined from the investigation are parafunctional habits of the patient over the implantation period.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the product was nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|