• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CONCERTO NYLON; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CONCERTO NYLON; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number NV-3-8-HELIX
Medical Device Problem Code Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/01/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: as found condition: the concerto coil was returned within a shipping box and within a sealed biohazard pouch.Visual inspection/damage location details: the concerto coil was returned without the introducer sheath.The pusher was found to be bent at approximately 145.0cm from the proximal end.The concerto implant coil appeared to be broken and detached from the pusher and not returned for analysis.No other anomalies were observed.Testing analysis: the concerto coil could not be used for resistance testing with an in-house catheter due to its damaged condition.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and the reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿coil resistance/stuck at catheter hub¿ was confirmed.The concerto implant coil was broken off the distal end of the pusher and not returned for analysis.In addition, the pusher was found bent.The concerto coil can become damaged if advanced against resistance.Possible causes for resistance at catheter hub are, but not limited to failure to use a compatible microcatheter for delivery, improper hubbing technique (sheath not properly seated in hub/excessive tightening of the rhv), or catheter hub transition.Improper hubbing technique could not be ruled out as a potential cause.The model and lot numbers for the microcatheter used in the event were not provided; therefore, compatibility could not be assessed.Since the catheter wasn¿t returned, an analysis could not be performed.The root cause of the resistance could not be determined.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received a report that the coil was stuck at the catheter hub.No patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.The reported device and any accessory devices were prepared as indicated in the ifu.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3: the concerto coil was returned without the introducer sheath.The pusher was found to be bent at ~145.0cm from the proximal end.The concerto implant coil was not returned for analysis.No other anomalies were observed.The concerto coil could not be used for resistance testing with an in-house catheter due to its damaged condition.Based on the device analysis and the reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿coil resistance/stuck at catheter hub¿ was not confirmed as the coil appeared to be prematurely detached from the pusher.The cause could not be determined.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3: product analysis of nv-3-8-helix, lot# b321222 as found condition: the concerto coil was returned within a shipping box and within a sealed biohazard pouch.Visual inspection/damage location details: the concerto coil was returned without the introducer sheath.The pusher was found to be bent at 145.0cm from the proximal end.The concerto implant coil appeared to be broken from the distal end of the pusher and not returned for analysis.No other anomalies were observed.Testing analysis: the concerto coil could not be used for resistance testing with an in-house catheter due to its damaged condition.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and the reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿coil resistance/stuck at catheter hub¿ was confirmed.The concerto implant coil was broken off the distal end of the pusher and not returned for analysis.In addition, the pusher was found bent.The concerto coil can become damaged if advanced against resistance.Possible causes for resistance at catheter hub are, but not limited to failure to use a compatible microcatheter for delivery, improper hubbing technique (sheath not properly seated in hub/excessive tightening of the rhv), or catheter hub transition.Improper hubbing technique could not be ruled out as a potential cause.The model and lot numbers for the microcatheter used in the event were not provided; therefore, compatibility could not be assessed.Since the catheter wasn¿t returned, an analysis could not be performed.The root cause of the resistance could not be determined.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONCERTO NYLON
Common Device Name
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key15670531
Report Number2029214-2022-01805
Device Sequence Number6421567
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00847536033528
UDI-Public00847536033528
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryKS
PMA/510(K) Number
K090046
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/11/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/10/2025
Device Model NumberNV-3-8-HELIX
Device Catalogue NumberNV-3-8-HELIX
Device Lot NumberB321222
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/25/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/30/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/30/2023
05/03/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/25/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/11/2023
05/11/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/11/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-