It was reported that, on the literature review "which implant for proximal femoral osteotomy in children? a comparison of the ao (asif) 90[degrees] fixed-angle blade plate and the richards intermediate hip screw", the femoral neck had rotated around the lag screw in one (1) patient, after a primary osteotomy was performed, using the compression hip screw system.The fixation system was revised 2 weeks postoperatively with a larger lag screw and the addition of an anti-rotation screw.At follow-up, the status of the patient was deemed as satisfactory.No further information is available.
|
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, as of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to report event.Per the literature review, no further information is available.The images provided in the article have been interpreted within the text; therefore, no further analysis of the images is required.Based on the information provided, the fixation system was revised 2 weeks postoperatively with a larger lag screw and the addition of an anti-rotation screw.Since it was reported, at follow-up, the status of the patient was deemed as satisfactory, no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should any additional relevant medical information be provided, this case would be re-assessed.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include abnormal motion over time, bone degeneration, size selected, inadequate integration between the cement and bone/implant, osteolysis and/or traumatic injury.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|