Description of event according to initial reporter: the physician was unable to snare the hook of the filter.Using right internal jugular access, the physician attempted to snare the hook of the filter which was tilted lateral within the patient, with the struts acting as a ¿backstop¿ to prop the filter at a 30-degree tilt with the hook facing medial.Physician tried to used a reverse curve catheter (c2 was all that he had in a 100 cm length) with a wire to attempt to pull the filter away from the cava wall and center it for retrieval but that was unsuccessful.Physician decided that since they didn¿t have long enough catheters at their obl, it would be best to refer the patient to another physician.There is some confusion as to when the filter was deployed.
|
Manufacturers ref# (b)(4).Summary of investigational findings: the physician was unable to retrieve the filter due to the filter was tilted.The physician attempted to pull the filter away from the cava wall to center it for retrieval but was unsuccessful.The physician abandoned the procedure and referred the patient to another hospital.Cook was unable to conduct a review of the device history record, as the lot number of the complaint device was not provided for the investigation.According to the instruction for use potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: retrieval failure.There are adequate controls in place to ensure that this type of device is manufactured to specifications.Despite attempts to obtain images it was not provided.However, with the information provided a significant tilt was observed during removal attempt which likely contributed to the difficulty encountered and made it impossible for the physician to retrieve the filter.It is unknown if the filter tilt occurred during implant procedure or during dwell time but both filter tilt and retrieval failure is known adverse events.Physician practice guidelines and published guidance from regulatory agencies recommend that patients with indwelling filters undergo routine follow-up.The risks/benefits of filter retrieval should be considered for each patient during follow-up.Once protection from pe is no longer necessary, filter retrieval should be considered.Filter retrieval should be attempted when feasible and clinically indicated.Filter retrieval is a patient-specific, clinically complex decision; the decision to remove a filter should be based on each patient¿s individual risk/benefit profile (e.G., a patient¿s continued need for protection from pe compared to their experience with and (or) ongoing risk of experiencing filter-related complications).For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth.The filter is designed to be retrieved with the günther tulip vena cava filter retrieval set.It may also be retrieved with the cloversnare® vascular retriever.Cook has not performed testing to evaluate the safety or effectiveness of filter retrieval using other retrieval systems or techniques.The published clinical literature includes descriptions of alternative techniques for filter retrieval; use of these techniques varies according to physician experience, patient anatomy, and filter position.The safety or effectiveness of these alternative retrieval techniques has not been established.Specific for ¿embedded¿ a filter that is embedded in the wall of the ivc may be difficult to retrieve.For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth.Cook medical will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|