|
It is reported in the literature titled "per-oral endoscopic myotomy with division of septum (d-poem) in epithetic esophageal diverticula: outcomes at a median follow-up of two years,¿ a patient experienced a major adverse event after a procedure using a gastrovideoscope and a triangular tip knife.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports the scope used in the procedure.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports the knife used in the procedure.Esophageal epiphrenic diverticula (eed) are rare pulsion-type outpouchings at the lower end of esophagus.Traditionally, surgery has been performed in eed.More recently, per-oral endoscopic myotomy with septotomy (d-poem) has emerged as an option in these cases.In this study, we aim to determine the efficacy and safety of d-poem in cases with eed.The data of cases who underwent d-poem in cases with eed from march 2013 to nov 2020 were analyzed, retrospectively.The primary outcome of the study was clinical success.Secondary outcomes included technical success, procedure duration, reflux esophagitis, and adverse events.13 patients (males 9, 48.07 17.55 years) with eed underwent d-poem during the study period.Median size of the eed was 45 mm (range 25¿70).Associated esophageal motility disorder was found in 10 (76.9%) cases including type ii achalasia (3), type i (3), hypercontractile esophagus (2), and unspecified (2).Technical success was achieved in 12 (92.3%) cases.Median length of total and gastric myotomies were 10 cm (range 6¿20) and 3 cm (1¿3), respectively.At a median follow-up of 25 months, clinical success was achieved in 84.6% cases.Mean integrated relaxation pressures reduced significantly after poem procedure (25.80 13.24 vs 9.40 3.10, p=0.001).There was one major adverse event requiring surgical intervention.D-poem is an effective procedure in cases with eed.Long-term follow-up studies are required to ascertain the durability of response in these cases.There is no report of olympus device malfunction reported in any procedure described in this study.
|
|
The following additional information was received from the author: "as discussed in previous email (regarding another manuscript), the adverse events described in the study are not necessarily related to the device used.I have published over 100 articles and it may not be feasible to provide an explanation regarding an association between the knife used and adverse events every time.I have been using accessories from different manufacturers, but never got any query.I would prefer to use a device from a different manufacturer rather than providing explanation each time i publish a study using olympus knives and accessories.".
|
|
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.This supplemental report includes information added to b5.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
|