Model Number 4515-70-101 |
Device Problem
Malposition of Device (2616)
|
Patient Problem
Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
|
Event Date 10/04/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.Concomitant medical devices and therapy dates, robotic assisted base station device, unknown.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a total knee arthroplasty procedure, while using the robotic assisted satellite station device, it was observed that the following a software update, there was difficulty in getting anterior cortex registration.It was reported that after several failed attempts at getting it to register, the user was able to register.It was further reported that the femoral component was downsized and it said it was going to notch.As a result, the user selected to anteriorize the femoral component and add flexion until it showed that it wasn't going to notch.The reporter stated that it said it should be.5mm above the anterior cortex.The surgeon proceeded to make the anterior cut and reported that it ¿botched¿ the femur.It was reported that the notch was severe enough that they had to convert to a revision femur with a cemented stem.It was reported that there was a 20 minute delay in the procedure.There was patient involvement.There were no injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.The exact date of this event is unknown.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d4, h4: the device serial number and date of manufacture were unknown in the initial report and have been updated accordingly.The device udi has also been updated.Udi: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The actual was evaluated and there were no defects observed with the system or the software.It was observed that the system was operating properly.Evaluation of the device log files was unable to confirm the described issue of a notch on the femur.The investigation found that the anterior cortex line acquisition was acquired to medially, in the middle of the femur and should have been acquired more laterally.The assignable root cause could not be determined.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|