(b)(4).Additional information provided: did the patient experience a post-op device malfunction? yes, if yes, please describe: post-operative patient of pancreaticoduodenectomy who required accommodation of 2 blake drains, with torpid evolution due to infection of the operative site organ space for which he required reintervention with insertion of 2 new drains, after that drains persist insufficient and dysfunctional for what required drainage collection percutaneous.Res is passed to technovigilance for review since it has not been the only case of dysfunction of blake drains used.Did the patient experience an adverse event such as infection, non-union, allergic reaction, osteoporosis, overloading, pain, degenerative diseases, bleeding or oozing? unknown, did the patient require revision surgery or hardware removal? yes.Was device explanted? false.Did patient require revision surgery? false.Was other medical intervention (e.G.X-rays, additional procedures, prescriptions, otc, revision) required? unknown.Is the patient part of a clinical study? unknown.Attempts have been made to obtain the following information and no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were there any intra-operative complications? if so, what were they? where was the tip of drainage tube located? how was the drain secured? what was the date of first activation? how was the product function verified following the first activation? who monitored the drainage and how often? when was the malfunction first noted? please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? were any concomitant procedures performed? what symptoms did the patient experience following the index surgical procedure? onset date? other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status? surgeon¿s name? if applicable, will product be returned? if so, please provide the return date and tracking information.Infection: please describe the patient manifestations of the reported infection (location, severity, appearance, systemic or local infection).Please provide the onset date/time of infection from the initial surgical procedure.Were there any pre-existing signs/symptoms of active infection prior to this surgical procedure? did the patient receive any prophylactic antibiotics pre-, intra- or post-operation? were cultures performed? if so, please provide the results.How much and what type of drainage is present in this wound? please describe any medical intervention performed including medication name and results.Attempts are being made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.The device history records were reviewed and the manufacturing criteria was met prior to the release of this lot.Note: events reported via mw# 2210968-2022-08924.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Additional information has been requested and the following was received.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.I look forward to the customer's response.However, a complete response of each question has not been received to date.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Additional information: retain sample of lot # was checked visually, and suction test was also performed.No defect, related to complaint was observed.No product returned for analysis.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|