Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).As stated in the complaint form, the event date is unknown.The bwi product analysis lab received the device for evaluation (b)(6)2022.The device evaluation was completed on (b)(6)2022.The product was returned to biosense webster for evaluation.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the hemostatic valve was found dislodged inside the hub of the vizigo sheath.A dilator was introduced with the hemostatic valve dislodged, and resistance was found.Then the hemostatic valve was taken off the hub, the dilator was introduced again, and no resistance was found.A microscopic examination of the hemostatic valve surface showed evidence of damage to the outer diameter.The dilator outer diameter was measured, and dimensions were found within specifications.The hemostatic valve dislodged could be related to the resistance reported by the customer.A device history record was performed, and no internal actions related to the reported complaint were identified.The issue reported by the customer was confirmed.The odp (optimal device performance guide) contains the following caution: always insert a dilator straight into the center of the sheath¿s valve to prevent damage to the valve.Do not insert a dilator at an angle, as damage to the sheath valve may occur.As part of the quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.This product issue will be addressed through bwi's quality system.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a procedure with a carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath - large and the biosense webster inc.Product analysis lab observed a hemostatic valve separation issue.Initially it was reported that the dilatator of the vizigo sheath was not insertable.The event occurred during sterile processing.The event occurred during field inspection.No patient consequence was reported.Additional clarification was requested and the response was received.The dilator was not insertable due to resistance.No physical damage on the sheath or dilator.There was no occlusion when irrigating the sheath.The sheath was narrowed.It was not possible to move the dilator inside the sheath.The event was assessed as not mdr reportable for a resistance with sheath issue.Interference or friction between devices is a known occurrence.If resistance is encountered, the system may be withdrawn as a unit.This is a common practice during procedures.Since the vast majority of ep procedures utilize multiple device exchanges, an increased potential for patient injury is remote.The biosense webster, inc.Product analysis lab received the device for evaluation and per the evaluation completion on (b)(6)2022 the hemostatic valve was found dislodged inside the hub of the carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ large.The returned condition was assessed as mdr reportable for a hemostatic valve separation issue.The awareness date for this reportable lab finding was (b)(6)2022.
|