• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT VASCULAR EMBOSHIELD NAV6 EMBOLIC PROTECTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT VASCULAR EMBOSHIELD NAV6 EMBOLIC PROTECTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 22443-19
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Stretched (1601); Difficult to Advance (2920); Material Too Soft/Flexible (4007)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/04/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a moderately calcified, moderately tortuous internal carotid artery that is 75% stenosed.The emboshield nav6 embolic protection system (eps) as attempted to be advanced across the lesion; however the barewire stopped giving any tactile feedback and stop advancing.Therefore, the eps was attempted to be removed; however, the eps barewire stretched (tip and coils) and separated near the groin.The tip of the wire was snared out and new emboshield nav6 was used to successfully complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient sequela and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Visual analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported, stretching and tip separation was confirmed.The difficulty advancing and lack of tactile feedback was not confirmed due to the condition of the returned unit.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar complaints reported from this lot.The investigation determined that the reported inadequate tactile feedback, difficulty advancing, stretched tip coils, and material separation resulting in unexpected medical intervention to snare the separated portion of the wire were likely related to procedural circumstances.Based on the reported information, it is likely that during the attempt to advance the barewire into the 75% stenosed lesion, the tip of the barewire became lodged/stuck and/or prolapsed within the artery resulting in stretching of the tip coils and ultimately separation during removal.The reported unexpected medical intervention to remove the separated tip was related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.Na.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EMBOSHIELD NAV6 EMBOLIC PROTECTION SYSTEM
Type of Device
EMBOLIC PROTECTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT VASCULAR
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, REG # 2024168
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
lindsey bell
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key15704673
MDR Text Key302760331
Report Number2024168-2022-11135
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NTE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
K141678
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/31/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number22443-19
Device Lot Number2030361
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/27/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/03/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-