|
It was reported that, while a trial reduction during uni procedure, a journey uni tib tr ins sz 1-2/8mm piece broke from the main body and was then retrieved by forceps.It is unknown how the surgery was completed.The procedure was finished with a non-significant delay.No further complications were reported.
|
|
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation but the pictures were reviewed, and revealed that the trial insert broke.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that the requested clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the event.Based on a review of the information provided, the broke piece was retrieved with forceps.According to the report, it is unknown how the surgery was completed.However, it was reported the surgery was completed with a non-significant delay.Since there was no harm alleged to this patient and no other complications were reported, no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history revealed similar events for the listed device over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batch based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.The device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries and cleaning cycles.As plastics are vulnerable, damage may occur during use and possible causes could be due to the heating and cooling associated with autoclaving or prolonged use.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.The contribution of the device to the reported incident could be corroborated as it may have occurred due to its extensive use.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
|