• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS LLC KINCISE¿ FEM HEAD IMPACTOR, REPLACE CAP; MOTOR, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT, AC-POWERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS LLC KINCISE¿ FEM HEAD IMPACTOR, REPLACE CAP; MOTOR, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT, AC-POWERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 1013-00-901
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/02/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Additional narrative: analysis of a photo of the device found that the device was cracked and broken in 2+ pieces.Therefore, the reported condition was confirmed.The damage is consistent with the device having been dropped or mis- aligned during use.Device history record shows that this lot of product was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to user error.Udi: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the impactor device head impactor tip was cracked.During an in-house engineering evaluation, it was determined that a photo of the device confirmed that the device was cracked and also broken in 2+pieces.It was not reported if the device was used in surgery, or if there was patient involvement.It was not reported if there were any delays in the surgical procedure, or if a spare device was available for use.It was not reported if there were any injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: d9, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: the actual device was returned for evaluation.During repair, an evaluation was performed and it was determined that the device had a damaged end cap, failed visual assessment and end cap thread assessment.Therefore, the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to improper handling which is user error.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
KINCISE¿ FEM HEAD IMPACTOR, REPLACE CAP
Common Device Name
MOTOR, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT, AC-POWERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS LLC
4500 riverside drive
palm beach gardens FL 33410
Manufacturer (Section G)
TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES MEDICAL
1428 pearman dairy rd
anderson SC 29625
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
4500 riverside drive
palm beach gardens, FL 33410
3035526892
MDR Report Key15716291
Report Number1045834-2022-01464
Device Sequence Number12431082
Product Code GEY
UDI-Device Identifier00845384018629
UDI-Public00845384018629
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNC
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number1013-00-901
Device Catalogue Number1013-00-901
Device Lot NumberJJAN00036
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/31/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/31/2025
03/31/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/02/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/01/2025
04/02/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/04/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-