|
It was reported that, after a bhr had been performed in 2009, the patient experienced a dislocation.A revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2022 for converting to thr by keeping the dysplasia cup in-situ, explanting the resurfacing head and replacing it with a dm liner, and implanting an exeter stem with a ceramic head.The current health status of patient is unknown.
|
|
H3, h6: it was reported that a revision surgery was performed due to dislocation.As of today, the implanted device used in treatment has not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the femoral head was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.No other similar complaints have been identified for device.As the device is no longer sold, no action is to be taken.In the absence of the actual device, the production records were reviewed for the device reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, no prior applicable escalation actions were identified.The available medical documents were reviewed.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the dislocation.The patient impact beyond the reported revision cannot be determined with the limited information provided.Based on the information provided we cannot confirm or further investigate the reported complaint, our investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are muscle and fibrous tissue laxity and malpositioning of the implants leading to postoperative joint instability.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|