| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding (1888)
|
| Date of Event |
10/19/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported "powerglide fell apart.It seems to be more of an issue when placing in more superficial vessels rather than deeper ones.Most likely due to the angle and pressure applied when advancing (leap frogging) into the vein.It causes it to split and open up like a space shuttle launching to the moon.Pieces falling off and breaking apart the further it travels.May just be operator error.Experienced the issue with the kit.No patient harm, just makes insertion difficult.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The date of event was not provided by the complainant/reporter, the date reflected in this report is the date bd became aware of the event.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of refy1478 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported "powerglide fell apart.It seems to be more of an issue when placing in more superficial vessels rather than deeper ones.Most likely due to the angle and pressure applied when advancing (leap frogging) into the vein.It causes it to split and open up like a space shuttle launching to the moon.Pieces falling off and breaking apart the further it travels.May just be operator error.Experienced the issue with the kit.No patient harm, just makes insertion difficult.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, complaint and batch history, applicable previous investigation(s), applicable manufacturing records, photo analysis and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of separation of the deployment device housing was inconclusive due to the sample condition.A series of six photographs of a powerglide pro deployment device and catheter were returned for evaluation.Only the distal end of the deployment device and part of the catheter were within the frame of the photographs.The top and bottom pieces of the deployment device housing were starting to separate, and the catheter was seen protruding from the side of the deployment device.The guidewire was not seen protruding from the distal end of the catheter and the guidewire push-off button did not appear to be in the fully advanced location.The housing is designed to separate as the catheter is advanced to allow for passage of the luer adaptor and wings off of the deployment device.It could not be determined from the photographs if the insertion sequence was followed or if the housing separated prematurely during the procedure.Without functional testing of the physical device, it could not be determined if the device failed to perform as intended.However, the report of a difficult insertion has been documented and included in complaint trending as part of ongoing efforts to identify potential issues.H3 other text : evaluation findings are in section h.11.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|