SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX TI 5.0 ULTRABRAID; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 72200755 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/19/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a shoulder cuff repair surgery, after implanted the twinfix suture anchor pulled out.The procedure was successfully completed using a back-up device in the original drilled bone hole, and a 4.5 starter was used to clear the insertion site.With no delay.No further complications were reported.Preliminary results of investigation found the anchor is fractured at the suture window and has biological debris on it.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The anchor was returned without the insertion device or suture material.The anchor is fractured at the suture window and has biological debris on it.A review of the customer provided image finds the anchor from the complaint device, fractured at the suture window.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.A functional evaluation could not be performed due to the broken anchor.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the anchor specifications found that no burrs, cracks, or contamination is allowed.A certification of compliance to material and processing specifications is required.The root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the break include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.Factors that could have contributed to the pull out include inadequate bone quality, improper preparation of the insertion site, or off-axis insertion of the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The anchor was returned without the insertion device or suture material.The anchor is fractured at the suture window and has biological debris on it.A review of the customer provided image finds the anchor from the complaint device, fractured at the suture window.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.A functional evaluation could not be performed due to the broken anchor.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the anchor specifications found that no burrs, cracks, or contamination is allowed.A certification of compliance to material and processing specifications is required.The root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the break include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.Factors that could have contributed to the pull out include inadequate bone quality, improper preparation of the insertion site, or off-axis insertion of the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|