• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number EVOLUTR-29
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/27/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: no product was returned.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during the loading of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, the loader tried to crimp the valve.No issues were observed during loading up to the beginning of the commissures.At that point, the valve began to bend.It was reported that it was very difficult to close the valve inside the capsule.The loader decided to re-open the valve.As the valve was opened, the loader noticed a fracture in the valve frame.The valve was exchanged for a new valve and the delivery catheter system (dcs) was replaced.The procedure was completed successfully using the replacement system.Of note, it was reported that the loader was experienced.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Unfortunately, the valve has not been returned for analysis to date.However, it should be known that loading of the valve is a process that is highly dependent on the operator technique.In this case, the inspection process per the instructions for use (ifu) was performed and properly identified the bent area of the valve during loading, prior to introduction to the patient.And then, when the loader re-opened / expanded the valve, it was noted that there was a stent break or fracture.It should also be noted that per the medtronic best practices training, the temperature of the loading bath should be between 0-8 degrees celsius.Bath temperatures not sufficiently chilled can lead to excess loading forces.In addition, proper lighting should always be used to visually confirm paddles are properly seated and all outflow crowns are captured within the capsule.While nitinol is a material which features ¿shape memory¿ and ¿super-elastic¿ material properties, extreme levels of strain/deformation beyond the elastic properties of the materials result in permanent/plastic deformation which is not reversed by warming the material.This effect is amplified if the loading process / deformation is not performed while the material is at sufficiently low temperatures, i.E.Ice bath conditions.Permanent deformation of the transcatheter aortic valve¿s nitinol frame can result from subjecting the device to extreme deformation conditions, such as those occurring during severe misloads of the valve into the compression loading system (cls) or the delivery catheter system (dcs), which most likely occurred in this event.This event took place prior to introduction of the patient, and no adverse patient effects were reported.This event does not indicate device misuse or malfunction.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: it should be known, that loading of the valve is a process that is highly dependent on the operator technique; in this case, the inspection process per the instructions for use (ifu) was performed and properly to identified the bent area of the valve during loading, prior to introduction to the patient.And then, when the loader re opened / expanded the valve, it was noted that there was a stent break or fracture.It should also be noted that per the medtronic best practices training, the temperature of the loading bath should be between 0-8 degrees celsius.Bath temperatures not sufficiently chilled can lead to excess loading forces.In addition, proper lighting should always be used to visually confirm paddles are properly seated and all outflow crowns are captured within the capsule.While nitinol is a material which features ¿shape memory¿ and ¿super-elastic¿ material properties, extreme levels of strain/deformation beyond the elastic properties of the materials result in permanent/plastic deformation which is not reversed by warming the material.This effect is amplified if the loading process / deformation is not performed while the material is at sufficiently low temperatures, i.E.Ice bath conditions.Permanent deformation of the tav¿s nitinol frame can result from subjecting the device to extreme deformation conditions, such as those occurring during severe misloads of the valve into the cls or the dcs, which most likely occurred in this event.In addition, based on observations and event description, valve f138085 experienced breakage of a frame strut, which is consistent with overloading while loading the valve into the delivery system and ultimately triggers a fracture.The concluded root caused is a misload.This event does not indicate device misuse or malfunction.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, the valve was returned via fedex inside its original jab submerged in clear solution.All leaflets were flexible and intact.All leaflets were in the closed position.All commissures were intact.Visual inspection revealed a frame fracture between cells c124 and c133 in addition to multiple kinked struts lateral to the c paddle.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key15754725
MDR Text Key304788349
Report Number2025587-2022-03123
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/24/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/08/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/05/2023
Device Model NumberEVOLUTR-29
Device Catalogue NumberEVOLUTR-29
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/05/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-