• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST PAUL PNEUPAC VENTILATORS BABYPAC; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST PAUL PNEUPAC VENTILATORS BABYPAC; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Model Number 150003
Medical Device Problem Code Failure to Cycle (1142)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/25/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A product sample was received and is awaiting evaluation and investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that hold peep even when set to zero.There has been no report of patient involvement or no observable clinical symptoms or a change in symptoms identified in the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Other, other text: b5: additional information.H6: event problem and evaluation codes: updates not required.H10: device evaluation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information received via email 09-nov-2022: event date updated:10/25/2022.No patient involvement was reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing device history record review was not performed because the results of the complaint investigation do not indicate a problem with the manufacture of the device.No causes or potential causes of the customer's reported problem were found during the review of service and repair records.A product sample was received for evaluation.Visual and functional testing was performed.Visual inspection found no unacceptable physical damages.The valve diaphragm is missing.Functional testing found positive end-expiratory pressure (peep) was measuring 0 cmh2o and active peep measuring 3 cm h20.Measurement was in spec between 0-3 cmh2o at the zero setting.Device passed all functional testing.No problem found.Root cause cannot be determined as the sample was successfully tested and no discrepancies were detected.This issue will be monitored for any increase in occurrence.If the occurrence of this issue increases significantly, additional investigative action will be taken accordingly.This remediation mdr was generated under protocol (b)(4), as a result of warning letter cms# (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PNEUPAC VENTILATORS BABYPAC
Common Device Name
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST PAUL
1265 grey fox rd.
st. paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
NULL
1265 grey fox rd.
st. paul MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
jim vegel
6000 nathan lane north
minneapolis, MN 55442
MDR Report Key15754979
Report Number3012307300-2022-26908
Device Sequence Number2868794
Product Code CBK
UDI-Device Identifier10610586045578
UDI-Public10610586045578
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K970158
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/14/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number150003
Device Catalogue Number150003
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/31/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/26/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/09/2022
05/23/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/08/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/17/2022
06/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/14/2011
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-