MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL TRUESPAN MENISCAL REPAIR SYSTEM PLGA 24 DEGREE; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 228162 |
Device Problems
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).It was reported by the sales rep in taiwan that during an unknown surgery on an unknown date, it was observed that the trigger on the truespan meniscal repair system plga 24 degree device was damaged and would not fire smoothly.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).The expiration date is currently unavailable.Reporter is a j&j sales representative.The device manufacture date is currently unavailable.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary : the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection and functional test of device received.Visual inspection reveals that the red trigger is broken.The plastic sleeve and the plates were not with the device, and they were not returned.The device was opened to verify the broken part, it was found that the upper part of the red trigger is broken.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 8l67483 and no non conformances were identified.Based on the condition of the device received, this complaint can be confirmed.The process of the truespan have two phases where the deployment gun is checked (the step of applier functional testing and the implant system routing check), this test guaranties the applier has been properly assembled and is functional.This information corresponds to a process control, and it is the appropriate document to use to guarantee that this issue can¿t have happened during manufacturing process.No information was provided on how this failure has occurred or specifications of the procedure, therefore a definitive root cause could not be determined.The possible root cause for the reported failure could be related when not inserting the needle to the proper depth for deployment which have caused that the implant not be deployed as intended which could cause stuck.When attempted to fire the implant against the tissue, it can feel a resistance and excessive force applied could have caused stress on the handle thus causing the handle mechanism to break.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.As per ifu, for the needle insertion, it is necessary use a calibrated probe, measure the width of the meniscal tissue to help insert into the joint.Set the adjustable depth stop to minimize tissue penetration depth.Also, during needle insertion use a malleable graft retractor or slotted cannula to prevent the needle from catching on or damaging tissue.As part of depuy synthese mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthese mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|