DEPUY MITEK LLC US VAPR COOLPULSE 90 ELECTRODE, 90° SUCTION W/INTEGRATED HANDPIECE; ENDOSCOPIC ELECTROSURGICAL ELECTRODE, BIPOLAR, SINGLE USE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 228146 |
Device Problem
Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 06/18/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).It was reported by the sales rep in south korea that during an unknown surgery on an unknown date, it was observed that the vapr coolpulse 90 electrode, 90° suction w/integrated handpiece device had no suction.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).Reporter is a j&j sales representative.The device manufacture date is currently unavailable.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the device was received and evaluated.Visual inspection revealed that the electrode is in normal use condition.The cable is in good condition as well as the connector and pins.The suction tube shows saline residues.The active tip shows signs of activation.When connected to the test generator, the electrode was immediately recognized.When performing the functional test, the ablation and the coagulation functions were able to work.The electrode will be sent to the manufacturer for further analysis.Manufacturer evaluation result for vapr coolpulse90 electrode: two devices returned.Neither device has been returned in its original packaging.Both active tips are in a used condition, with evidence of activation and tissue debris in and around the active tips.Residue visible in the suction tubes.No visible damage to the device shafts, handles, cables or plugs.The electrical test was performed, as a result, all the parameters passed the test.Functional testing was conducted, the flow test failed.Multiple attempts to free the blockage on each device was conducted; including a positive pressure applied to the suction path of the devices, along with a negative pressure, and both conducted whilst activating the devices.None of these attempts were successful in clearing the blockages to restore the flow rate within specification.To confirm the location of the blockages, a thin gauge wire was inserted into the suction tube until the blockage was reached.A restriction was found 60mm inside the active suction tube from the proximal end.It believed the restriction was tissue debris.Manufacturer summary: from our investigation we were able to confirm the customer report that the electrode suction was clogged with both the returned devices.Both devices were found to fail flow specifications due to a build-up of tissue debris within the suction path at the distal end of the device.Dhr review has been performed for lot and no issues non conformances or deviations with the manufacturing process have been indicated.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|