| Model Number |
240765 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
False Negative Result (1225)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/21/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.(b)(6).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that bd bbl¿ vdrl antigen false negative occurred.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer reported 1).Cap survey "ga"; (b)(6) 2022; sample #g-02 was "reactive" while was supposed to be a neg.Attached survey says g-02 was non reactive and the intended report is reactive.Hazard, injury or erroneous results details which assays or tests are exhibiting issues? 240765.Are the values of the assays available? yes.Analyzer name & model #n/a.How many units (tubes) affected? 1.What is the frequency or occurrence rate (1 day, % of tubes affected, patients involved, how many tests per day etc.) pt.What was method of draw? ¿ straight needle ¿ wingset ¿ syringe ¿ line ¿ unsure/other (please list) pt is tube filled to stated volume? unknown.What was order of draw? n/a.How many times was the tube inverted? unknown.How were tubes transported? (pneumatic system, carrier, etc.) n/a.How long after collection were tubes processed? n/a.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that bd bbl¿ vdrl antigen false negative occurred.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer reported 1).Cap survey "ga"; may 16, 2022; sample #g-02 was "reactive" while was supposed to be a neg.Attached survey says g-02 was non reactive and the intended report is reactive.Hazard, injury or erroneous results details which assays or tests are exhibiting issues? 240765.Are the values of the assays available? yes.Analyzer name & model #n/a.How many units (tubes) affected? 1.What is the frequency or occurrence rate (1 day, % of tubes affected, patients involved, how many tests per day etc.) pt.What was method of draw? straight needle wingset syringe line unsure/other (please list) pt.Is tube filled to stated volume? unknown.What was order of draw? n/a.How many times was the tube inverted? unknown.How were tubes transported? (pneumatic system, carrier, etc.) n/a.How long after collection were tubes processed? n/a.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
After further evaluation of the complaint, it has been determined that the previously submitted report 1119779-2022-01376 was sent in error.There was no report of serious injury, medical intervention, or reportable device malfunction.Therefore this is not considered to be a reportable malfunction.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|