|
|
| Model Number |
SCPX132TH |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
09/12/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a female patient who underwent an unknown breast surgery with an unknown mentor tissue expander breast implants has experienced left-sided deflation postoperative.As a result, patient underwent bilateral replacement with left/ catalog number 3505004bc, serial number (b)(4), right side- unknown on (b)(6) 2022.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.Since no lot number was provided, no manufacturing record evaluation could be performed.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: deflation.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information received on december 2, 2022 indicated that on (b)(6) 22 patient noticed significant increase in clear fluid output into her breast drains and noticeable deflation of the left breast tissue expander.Patient age at the time of event was 60 years old, ethnicity is caucasian, and suspect device information is as follow: sn#: (b)(6), cat#: scpx132th.The patient fully recovered after removal on (b)(6) 2022.A manufacturing record evaluation is in progress.Once completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Manufacturer¿s reference number (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation completed on february 09 , 2023: during the visual evaluation of the tissue expander, the tear was not identified.As a result, leak testing was performed in accordance with mentor procedures, and a tear was identified at the 9 o¿clock position.When evaluated under a microscope the tear pattern did not reveal parallel striations consistent with markings made by a sharp instrument.As the authorization form for examination was not received the evaluation was limited to non-destructive testing.Based on the current information, a product issue was identified during the investigation of the sample received.This product issue will be addressed through mentor¿s quality system.Manufacturing investigation was performed, and the process controls and data records collected are within specification.For the suspect tear in the expander for the lot number reported, this complaint is not able to be confirmed as a manufacturing defect.We would like to assure you that mentor adheres to the highest standards of quality.Our quality assurance process is robust for every product we make and requires that each mentor product undergoes a stringent visual inspection and rigorous testing prior to shipment.In addition, we maintain a comprehensive quality assurance system that complies with the food and drug administration's (fda) good manufacturing practice regulations.Prior to shipping, our devices are checked to ensure that they satisfy these standards in accordance with these processes.We also closely and continually monitor and review the clinical performance and real-world evidence for all our products through clinical studies, registries, and post-market surveillance activities.Potential cause: while deflation is historically the most common complication related to tissue expanders, the rate of deflation with mentor® tissue expanders remains very low.An incident of this nature may be the result of one or more of the following factors: overinflation of the tissue expander, use of the tissue expander in emerging surgical techniques not identified in the instructions for use (ifu), continuous and sustained stresses to the tissue expander, vigorous body movement (e.G.Physical exercise) or excessive manipulation/ trauma in the region of the expander.At mentor, we are committed to delivering high-quality tissue expanders and an exceptional customer experience.We take your concerns seriously and would like to thank you for taking the time to provide us with the information that was critical for our investigation and our post-market surveillance.We have shared your experience with our research and development team as they consider all customer feedback, and emerging surgical trends as they develop next-generation product designs and innovations.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.The manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was reviewed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|