|
It was reported that, during an internal fixation surgery, the end of the compression screw hexdriver broke and remained in the end of the screw, when inserting the compression screw.Surgery was finished after a non-significant delay, and changing the surgical technique.No further complications reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Smith & nephew is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 c.F.R.Part 803.This report may be based upon information which smith & nephew has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, smith & nephew, or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, smith & nephew or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.(b)(4).
|
|
H3, h6.The associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device did confirm the stated failure mode.The tip of the device was fractured off.A review of complaint history revealed similar events for the listed device over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batch based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that based on the information provided, the definitive root cause of the reported failure could not be determined.According to the report, the retained non-implantable end of the compression screw hexdriver was left inside of an implantable screw inside of the femur; therefore, the potential for micro-motion and/or migration of the retained piece is unknown.However, we cannot make conclusions on the impact of the non-implantable foreign body to the patient.According to the report, the screwdriver release handle was warped as a result, the surgeon changed the surgical technique completed the procedure with a non-significant delay.Since no other complications were reported, no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.As the device broke and it can no longer fit its purpose, the contribution of the device to the reported event could be corroborated.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are likely potential factors that could contribute to the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|