According to the complaint, on (b)(6) 2022 the customer is questioning result difference between the abl800 flex analyzer (serial number:(b)(4) and a siemens atelica.The sample was measured on the abl800 flex (serial number: (b)(4) and the following results were obtained on the bilirubin parameters: (b)(6) 2022, 10:05, 338 umol/l.(b)(6) 2022, 12:52, error 581.(b)(6) 2022, 13:42, error 581.(b)(6) 2022, 14:40, error 581.(b)(6) 2022, 23:53, 187 umol/l.The sample was also measured on a siemens atelica and the following comparison results were obtained on the bilirubin parameters: (b)(6) 2022, 08:50, 538 umol/l.(b)(6) 2022, 10:20, 541 umol/l.(b)(6) 2022, 13:35, 464 umol/l.(b)(6) 2022, 14:50, 401 umol/l.(b)(6) 2022, 20:00, 316 umol/l.(b)(6) 2022, 08:00, 193 umol/l.Based on these measurements, the customer has reported the results obtained from the abl800 flex as false low.Customer has also reported that treatment was conducted based on the results from the non-radiometer product (siemens atelica).).
|