|
|
| Model Number |
212726 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
| Date of Event |
11/07/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).Reporter is a j&j sales representative.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the sales rep in south korea that during a bankart repair surgery on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that the anchor tip on the bioknotless plus w/orthocord device broke that remained inside the patient.It was unknown how the procedure was completed.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary : a photo was provided by the customer and evaluated.Upon visual inspection of the photo, the tip of the inserter was broken.This complaint can be confirmed.The photo does not provide enough evidence to determine root cause.The physical analysis can provide the evidence to discern a root cause.The possible root cause for the issue reported can be attributed by mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload, and can be associated to with off axis insertion, excessive force and levering during insertion.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.As per ifu, do not twist or apply a bending force to the inserter.This can damage the anchor, suture, or inserter tip.Moving the power drill unit off the axis of the hole while drilling may cause the drill tip to break.Incomplete insertion or poor bone quality may result in anchor pullout.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 9l50727, and no nonconformances were identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.B5: subsequent follow-up with the customer, additional information was received regarding the event.Therefore, the event description has been updated accordingly.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).It was reported by the sales rep in south korea that during a bankart repair surgery on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that the anchor tip on the bioknotless plus w/orthocord device broke that remained inside the patient.It was unknown how the procedure was completed.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary : the products were returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of devices received.Upon visual inspection, the tip of the inserter in both devices are broken.This complaint can be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 9l50727, and no nonconformances were identified.The possible root cause for the broken tip can be attributed to mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload, it can be associated to off axis insertion, excessive force and levering during insertion.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.As per ifu, do not twist or apply a bending force to the inserter, this can damage the anchor, suture, or inserter tip.Moving the power drill unit off the axis of the hole while drilling may cause the drill tip to break.Incomplete insertion or poor bone quality may result in anchor pullout.In regards hospital concern, it was already addressed through mir process.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|