| Model Number |
26929 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Material Deformation (2976)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
| Date of Event |
11/02/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the marker band detached during stent deployment and remained in the patient.The patient underwent a peripheral angioplasty procedure of the right lower extremity with pedal access and a 6f non-bsc introducer.The mildly tortuous target lesions were severely calcified, with stenosis measuring 84% in the posterior tibial (pt), 41% in the popliteal artery, and 93% in the superficial femoral artery (sfa).Intravascular ultrasound (ivus) was used to confirm the calcification.The rotapro 1.75 x 135 was selected to open the blockages.The sfa was predilated using a charger 5.0 x 120.The innova 6 x 120 x 130 was then inserted but would not advance all the way to deployment site.The innova was removed undeployed with difficulty.Upon inspection, the tip of the outer retractable deployment sheath appeared burred, and the physician elected to replace the device with another stent rather than reinsert.The patient was then dilated using a coyote 2.5 x 120 balloon.A new innova 6 x 120 x 130 was then inserted without resistance and deployed without any issues.The delivery system was removed without issue.The charger 5.0 x 120 was then used to post dilate the stent.During final imaging, what appeared to be a marker band from the innova delivery system was observed in the patient artery.There was no flow restriction, so the physician elected to leave the marker band in place to avoid possible harm during removal.The area was post dilated with coyote 2.5 x 120 balloon to make sure the marker band was adhered to the wall of the artery.There were no reported adverse patient consequences as a result of the issue.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device media analysis: returned product consisted of an innova self-expanding stent system.The outer sheath, tip, inner sheath, and the remainder of the device were checked for damage.Visual examination revealed that the rack was separated at the handle.The proximal section was missing.Microscopic examination revealed no damages.The stent appeared to have been deployed and did not return for analysis.Inspection of the remainder of the device presented no other damage or irregularities.Product analysis could not confirm any issues with the marker band.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the marker band detached during stent deployment and remained in the patient.The patient underwent a peripheral angioplasty procedure of the right lower extremity with pedal access and a 6f non-bsc introducer.The mildly tortuous target lesions were severely calcified, with stenosis measuring 84% in the posterior tibial (pt), 41% in the popliteal artery, and 93% in the superficial femoral artery (sfa).Intravascular ultrasound (ivus) was used to confirm the calcification.The rotapro 1.75 x 135 was selected to open the blockages.The sfa was predilated using a charger 5.0 x 120.The innova 6 x 120 x 130 was then inserted but would not advance all the way to deployment site.The innova was removed undeployed with difficulty.Upon inspection, the tip of the outer retractable deployment sheath appeared burred, and the physician elected to replace the device with another stent rather than reinsert.The patient was then dilated using a coyote 2.5 x 120 balloon.A new innova 6 x 120 x 130 was then inserted without resistance and deployed without any issues.The delivery system was removed without issue.The charger 5.0 x 120 was then used to post dilate the stent.During final imaging, what appeared to be a marker band from the innova delivery system was observed in the patient artery.There was no flow restriction, so the physician elected to leave the marker band in place to avoid possible harm during removal.The area was post dilated with coyote 2.5 x 120 balloon to make sure the marker band was adhered to the wall of the artery.There were no reported adverse patient consequences as a result of the issue.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|