|
DEPUY MITEK LLC US 5.5MM HEALIX PEEK 3-SUTURE ANCHOR W/ORTHOCORD; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
222207 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/11/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by a healthcare professional in china that during a rotator cuff repair procedure on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that the suture on the 55.5mm healix peek 3-suture anchor w/orthocord device broke off.Another like device was used to complete the surgery.There were no adverse consequences to the patient nor surgical delay reported.No additional information could be provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary : the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received.Upon visual inspection of the device, it was observed that the suture was breakage and frayed on different parts.Therefore, this complaint can be confirmed.The anchor and cover handle were not returned along with the device.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 9l17489, and no nonconformances were identified.No additional information was provided about details of the procedure; therefore, a definitive root cause could not be determined.The possible root cause for the frayed suture can be attributed to procedures variables such as: snaps or other instrument to pull the suture without wrapping the suture around the snaps creates a stress point on the suture, resulting in breaking it, however, this cannot be conclusively determined.As per ifu, is indicated to apply tension (normal force) on suture lengths.Excessive force may overload the anchor or suture.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-upmedwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device has not been returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, photos of the suture were provided.Upon visual inspection of the photos, it appeared that suture was broken and frayed; therefore, this complaint can be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 9l17489, and no nonconformances were identified.The photos do not provide enough evidence to determine root cause.Without physical evaluation of the devices reported, we cannot establish a root cause for the issue experienced by the customer.The possible root cause for the frayed suture can be attributed to procedures variables such as: snaps or other instrument to pull the suture without wrapping the suture around the snaps creates a stress point on the suture, resulting in breaking it, however, this cannot be conclusively determined.As per ifu, is indicated to apply tension (normal force) on suture lengths.Excessive force may overload the anchor or suture.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|